Am I allowed to buy a horse or elephant in India?

0
UmaimaMalik
Jul 26, 2019 02:43 PM 0 Answers
Member Since Dec 2018
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

If yes, how much would it cost to buy it and provide for it?

Muhammad Zeeshan
- Jul 26, 2019 02:47 PM

Currently, there are fourteen Democrats officially running for president. In addition, according to the most up-to-date lists from news organizations like The New York Times, The Hill, etc. etc., there are also fourteen potential candidates, people who are either seriously considering it, or are rumoured to be considering it, or are being pushed to consider it.

Here are the fourteen Democratic candidates currently running:

Booker
Buttigieg
Castro
Delaney
Gabbard
Gillibrand
Harris
Hickenlooper
Inslee
Klobuchar
Sanders
Warren
Williamson
Yang

And here are the fourteen people most knowledgeable reporters believe might also join the Democratic race:

Bennet
Biden
Bloomberg
Brown
Bullock
de Blasio
Gillum
Kerry
McAuliffe
Moulton
O’Rourke
Ryan
Schiff
Swalwell

For what it’s worth, of the latter fourteen, I personally believe that exactly half, seven, will NOT run. Those non-starters are Bennet, de Blasio, Gillum, Kerry, Moulton, Schiff and Swalwell.

Which leaves, ultimately, a total of 21 candidates running in the end, one more than the Dems have said they will accommodate in their debates. So there will be one odd man out or one woman out, who will probably make a bit of a stink. Currently they plan a two-debate series once a month, with a maximum of ten candidates in each debate. If you ask me, they should relent and have a three-debate series instead. Why create bad feelings over the issue of one candidate? Yes, it’s true that there are requirements, in terms of polling strength and grassroots small-dollar fund-raising, which a candidate must fulfil to qualify for the debates. But those requirements are not onerous and the chances are very good that all the candidates will meet them. So why single out one candidate to be screwed? Who needs the headache? For one single candidate, it’s not worth the hassle. Is it really worth damaging the image of the DNC yet again, as they did in 16 with their tilted Friday night and Saturday night debates, over such a trivial nitpick as one candidate? I really don’t think so.

In any event, it’s a simple math proposition: 21 candidates, a three-debate series, 7 candidates per night. There; solved. No big deal.

Reply on This
Replying as Submit
0 Subscribers
Submit Answer
Please login to submit answer.
0 Answers